Applications / Federated cybersecurity
PRIVACY-AWARE COLLABORATION

Federated threat detection

Keep security logs local. Make every training contribution accountable.

Illustrative data
Round budget ↗
30credits

Financial budget, separate from privacy

Settled payment ▣
credits

Awaiting offers and execution

Accepted offers ◇
0/ 12 organizations

Confirmed locally by each client

Released updates ⇡
0updates

Training and uploads are simulated

01 / NETWORK

A network of independent participants

Round 1 · Ready
PendingAcceptedDeclinedSelect a node to inspect its local view
Privacy as
Commodity
Procurement · Coordination
Waiting for a task
03 / HOW IT WORKS

From a private preference to a traceable contribution

00 / 06
  1. 01Publish taskObjective & budget
  2. 02Collect bidsCost & privacy preference
  3. 03Make offersAllocation & payment
  4. 04Check locallyCapacity, ledger & utility
  5. 05Train & releaseProtected model updates
  6. 06Settle roundAggregation & audit

Play a round or advance one step at a time. Select an organization to inspect its local decision.

⌘
What happens inside the method?Build a mean field, explore equilibrium, and understand the learning objective.
Explore the method ↗
04 / MECHANISM

Where MFG-RegretNet fits

Method overview
⇥Client reportsCost · Privacy capacity
→
◉Population contextSummary of current bids
→
⌘Allocation / PaymentLearned offer mapping
→
✓Budget projectionTotal offered payment ≤ B
Mean reported cost—Mean reported capacity—Total offered payment—
Training

Search for profitable misreports and penalize regret. A local rejection check protects execution; incentive guarantees require their own analysis.

CLIENT VIEW

Client 01 · Campus gateway

01

Local constraints and decisions

Reported / true capacity—
Allocated ε / offered credits—
Realized utility this round—
Cumulative ε · Demo0.00 / 2.00
Waiting for an offer
05 / CONTRACTS

Every offer, explained

Credits and ε have different units · Illustrative records
ParticipantBid vReported capAllocated εOffered creditsLocal decisionSettled credits
06 / AUDIT TRAIL

A record of every step

    FROM METHODS TO EVIDENCE

    Compare the manuscript results

    Explore accuracy, incentive security, and welfare across the proposed method and its baselines.

    Open results comparison ↗
    MNISTCIFAR-10Mean ± SD

    A fixed snapshot of the manuscript tables. The live workflow above remains a synthetic illustration.

    ▤
    The research behind this demoDependable and Secure Privacy Trading in Federated Learning via MFG-RegretNet · Sun et al., 2026.
    Read the paper ↗
    ABOUT THIS DEMO

    A workflow you can explore

    The 12 organizations, their bids, offers, and events are synthetic teaching data.

    This website is independent of the running experiments and does not access GPU tasks or partial research results.